Thursday, December 12, 2013

Cooling Off

Westbourne Gardens had a visit (Friday 6th Dec 2013) from the Chief Executive of Trowbridge Town Council which I have to assume was provoked by an email I sent (from my personal account) on the 26th November to the town and county councillors representing Westbourne Gardens and included  Mr. Allan , NARA and the Wiltshire Police Commissioner in the list of recipients.

I volunteer that the tone of the email was a little harsh - that said - I'm sure the recipients have seen far worse...   Up to the time of this post - only Sharon Draper chairperson of NARA has had the courtesy to actually acknowledge receipt of the email and Sharon also forwarded Lance Allan's response/"report" which he chose apparently to circulate solely to councillors and Sharon.

I have deliberately waited a few days (as per the title of this post...) before formulating a public response. 

In summary, it's appreciated that Mr. Allan took the time to do a (possibly illegal? - since it would seem that he didn't actually contact any residents) - drive-by on Westbourne Gardens. However, congratulations end there.

Council officials are not expected to guess the law and make stuff up. Whilst I can see this is a "quick take" - I do not care for the wholesale errors, dismissive tone, opinion substituted for facts obtained by due diligence, shallow analysis and the implied threat of universal parking charges  - unprofessional some might call it .... I frankly expect rather more for £75K a year - this is woeful. The lack of even an acknowledgement response to the original email is rather telling IMHO.


So, in keeping with the title of this post, a cooling off period was required I thought - for a number of reasons.

  • Allow time for a structured and properly researched response from the recipients.
  • Allow adrenaline to ebb away and sweet reasonableness to prevail. 
a clear fail on both counts there then...

How many times do we have to point out that 
"non resident associated" parking in Westbourne Gardens is a traffic offence?   


I have in-lined my comments on Mr. Allan's missive below:

From the top

Having paid a visit to Westbourne Gardens today I can report as follows:
Having read Mr.  Allan's communication - a few observations:

There is no evidence of illegal parking in Westbourne Gardens, 
Simply wrong  - A pretty sweeping statement -  how would you know? - a sixth sense? a crystal ball? something that the 23 householders had entirely missed ? this idiotic assertion has irritated every resident who's seen it!  

now vehicles were parked on yellow lines, there were lots parked in those parts of the street which are unrestricted 
unrestricted ? What on earth do you think the signs mean? What bit of "Access Only" do you have a problem with? The entire street is restricted.  (facepalm)

. The area in front of #7 and #9 was coned off, presumably by the residents so that they are able to park in front of their properties when they come home from work this evening.
If you'd got out of your car and read the notes on the tape between the cones you'd have seen that a resident had a removal van arriving and needed the space for that. They delivered notes about the matter to all affected residents.

The ‘restriction’ in Westbourne Gardens is a “no motor vehicles except for access” one, which I believe allows anyone to drive down there to enable them to park in that road.
A belief! - and an totally ill informed wonky one to boot - kindly read the relevant parts of the various Road Traffic Acts - the 619/620 sign combination is "Access Only" - that means vehicular access to only the properties on the road with these signs   Multiple precedents are out there for enforcing this - not mere supposition or opinion - or even "belief". Non resident parking in Westbourne Gardens is a traffic offence which is endorsable by three penalty points. Wheeling out an unsupported legal assertion in this fashion is unacceptable from a public employee. 

There were only three cars parked in Stallards car park, where the charges are £1 for 1 hour £1.50 for 2 hours and £3.20 for 3 hours maximum.
£3.20 a day to park at the railway station - and more fines than parking fees at Stallards car park plus probably a lot less than 5% daytime utilisation (high proportion of Disabled Badges )  - hardly a shining example of a community amenity. Stallards Car park out of charging hours utilisation has dropped by at least 50% probably further since extension of the  control period 1 hour both ends of the day when pay and display imposed

I am not sure of season passes and residents pass arrangements.
FYI these seem to be quite variable according to anecdotal evidence from Bradford Road residents. 

I am not aware of any opportunity which Wiltshire Council would have to change the arrangements without going through legal publication and consultation channels. 
Just woeful - a TRO is not required - enforcement is what's required and not actually very much of that - historically a couple of times a year Wiltshire Police enforced the rat run that triggered the original TRO emplacing the 619/620 restriction signage. A singular lack of understanding of how traffic signage works is on display here. This not a parking issue per se - it's a traffic violation attracting a FPN in other places   TSGRD 2002 - contravention code 52 applies - nominally a FPN at the higher rate as it qualifies as a moving traffic offence.

I am not aware of any other issues being reported regarding lack of lighting in the car park.
Try knocking on a few doors on Bradford Road and asking the question. I take it that West Wiltshire District Council records regarding these issues are not available - is Mr. Allan unacquainted with Google?? see here: http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/wiltshire-council-put-up-cameras-in-stallards-car-park-in-trowbridge-and-stop-vandalism   

I would suggest that we bear this in mind in respect of the possibility of Westbourne Gardens being on the list for Residents Parking schemes and future local control of car parks.
Complete and utter self serving nonsense - Westbourne Gardens already has "resident only" parking.  



Copy of original Lance Allan site visit document.



4 Comments:

At December 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"the possibility of Westbourne Gardens being on the list for Residents Parking schemes and future local control of car parks"

That must fill local residents with glee eh?

 
At December 18, 2013 at 5:42 AM , Anonymous DISCOVER Trowbridge said...

Trowbridge Town Council are not responsible for on-street or off-street parking, but it is willing to take up issues of interest and concern for the town and its residents. So in response.:

Mr Allan's visit was as a result of your e-mail and was meant to aid the councillors, and in particular the Wiltshire Councillor to respond formally to the enquiry.

As you have already had a copy of the report there is no point in now sending it to you, having discussed the matter further with the councillor..

Mr Allan WALKED from the Civic Centre to Westbourne Gardens. He did not drive down there, so get your own facts right and stop making assumptions. He did nothing illegal.

The Town Council is not expected to know the law inside out. The Town Clerk is not a lawyer, the town council does not employ a lawyer and is not responsible for traffic offences nor on-street parking.

The report was meant to cast some light on your mis-information and rant, to help councillors see the full picture and decide if it was worthy of further consideration at a council meeting.

The Town Clerk only wishes he did earn £75,000 some would say he would be worth every penny.

You are wrong: anyone can park in Westbourne Gardens or any other street which has 'no-motor vehicles except for access'. Access includes access to park there and get out of the vehicle.

He was not in a car - wrong again.

If you have a problem with parking at the station have you complained to First?

Perhaps the Town Clerk should have just acknowledged your enquiry with a comment such as, 'Contact Wiltshire Council they are responsible for on-street parking or the police who are responsible for traffic offences.' That would have been a really helpful Town Council response.

Do you really want council officers to spend there valuable time trawling the internet for petitions?

Have a Great Christmas.

 
At December 18, 2013 at 5:07 PM , Blogger Gordon the Fence Post Tortoise said...

Thank you for calling it a rant - the frustration shows then?

It is not unreasonable to expect public officials to indulge in due diligence - not venturing uninformed guesses as to the legality of something when commenting in an official capacity should be common sense - that means checking the law regarding "access only".

I note that we are still left with an unsupported, uniformed assertion from a council related person about the legality of parking in a 619/620 signed road - kindly provide some providence / evidence or just keep digging...

The town council have it would seem - aspirations to control parking in the town- the matter having been mentioned in the local press upon occasion - so the town council has a vested interest here. I note a number of parking related items (apparently mostly revolving around resident's parking schemes = they'll be no additional charge... obviously?) on the Dec 3rd 2013 Meeting Agenda (PDF File)

If Mr. Allan walked up to Westbourne Gardens it is a little surprising that he did not see the notes on the tape between the bollards - explaining their purpose? ( and communicated his guess as to their purpose to councilors )

As to "trawling the Internet" - the fact that 40 or so people are frustrated enough about the situation in the Stallards car park to sign a petition should I think - be something that councillors should be aware of. I know that over the last 10 years multiple complaints have been made about vandalism & theft in that car park and that both West Wilts District council (RIP) and Wiltshire council have been subjected to multiple requests for improved security on the car park - even a token gesture seems too much - no problem with outdoor snooker though eh?

Due diligence would also - not unreasonably - involve canvassing the residents of Westbourne Gardens before any report to councilors.

FYI in 2011 Wiltshire Constabulary Traffic unit served warning notices on a number of parked vehicles not associated with properties on the road - the warning included the threat of prosecution under The Road Traffic Act 1988 Section 36.

If you're thinking about taking over town parking ... and charging us for the privilege Kindly do your homework...

Would the council have responded if this was all cozily tucked away quietly on individual computers / email archives?

 
At December 23, 2013 at 5:10 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

oooh! - calling you out on being an un-Christian miserablist?

Shame this stuffed shirt didn't identify him/herself and chose to hide behind the general council email address - like the way they've ignored the concerns of residents in general - somehow think Ms. Draper / NARA might get less emails from the council now?

 

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated - but as a rule unless it's really awful - it'll be published - this is just to avoid spam.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home